11:20 . Buy ASUS TUF Gaming VG279Q1A 27 Gaming Monitor, 1080P Full HD, 165Hz (Supports 144Hz), IPS, 1ms, Adaptive-sync/FreeSync Premium, Extreme Low Motion Blur, RTINGS.com . Here you can vote for our next review, Create or edit custom monitor ratings, your custom ratings will be present on the table tool, and other pages. You have to manually enable HDR from the monitor's OSD; it doesn't automatically switch. If you want a monitor with better out-of-the-box accuracy, check out the Lenovo Legion Y27q-20. There's a 27 inch model in the same series, theAcer Nitro XF273 Sbmiiprx; however, we haven't tested it. It has a great resolution and size that favors multitasking. Motion looks smoother on the MSI thanks to its quick response time, especially at 60Hz. The ASUS is better for gaming because it has a much higher refresh rate of 280Hz compared to the LG's 144Hz, and it also has better response times. The ASUS has a better contrast ratio, higher peak brightness, and wider viewing angles. The VG279AQL1A has wider viewing angles, gets brighter, and supports HDR. The Gigabyte M27Q and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM are both excellent gaming monitors, but they have very different configurations. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is a great gaming monitor. The VG259QM has a much higher refresh rate, faster response time, and HDR support. The ASUS' refresh rate is faster, which helps motion look smoother. The ASUS is a desktop gaming monitor with a 25 inch 1080p screen. We purchase our own monitors and If you want a monitor with an even higher refresh rate, check out the ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM. The VG27AQ has an okay response time at 60Hz. It has better ergonomics than the LG and gets brighter to combat glare. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM is a bitbetter than the Dell Alienware AW2521H. Other than that, these two monitors are remarkably similar. The ergonomics are terrible, which makes it hard to get a comfortable viewing position. LEARN ABOUT RESPONSE TIME @ MAX REFRESH RATE. However, the ergonomics are somewhat limited, and while it has a large 27 inch screen, its 1080p resolution isn't ideal if you tend to work with higher-resolution content. Both monitors have the same 144Hz refresh rate, but the 27GN800-B has better response times. The ASUS is an inch bigger than the Acer. The ASUS supports FreeSync, has much better ergonomics,better contrast and black uniformity,the out-of-box color accuracy is significantly better, and it supports HDR. They are very similarly built and look almost identical, but the IPS panel of the VG259QM has wider viewing angles and a slightly better contrast ratio. The AOC CQ27G2 is much better than the Samsung Odyssey G5 LC27G55T. However, even though it can display a wide color gamut, it doesn't get very bright in HDR, not enough to make highlights pop the way they should. It has a simple design, with a wide stand that supports the monitor welland okay ergonomics. It's mostly plastic and doesn't feel particularly premium, but there are no issues with the construction. There are four buttons and a joystick to power the monitor On/Off and navigate the on-screen menu. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A and the Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx areIPS gaming monitors with a 24" screen, 1080p resolution, and a 165Hz refresh rate. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A and the HP X24ih are very similar gaming monitors. The Acer Nitro XF243Y performs better than the LG 24GL600F for most uses. If you're looking for a similar budget model with better contrast, check out the LG 32GN600-B. It has a1440p resolution but it has a high 165Hz refresh rate, while the LG has a 4k panel, but a 60Hz refresh rate. The remaining inaccuracies aren't visible to the naked eye. The AOC CQ27G2 has a very similar design to the AOC CQ27G1, but with a silver stand instead of black. There are no noticeable gaps, and the bottom of the border is uniform. The AOC is a gaming monitor witha 144Hz refresh rate, a much faster response time, and lower input lag. Im happy with it, it also beats all my previous gaming monitors ive ever tested and its top rating on rtings, and I can see why. This is provided for reference only and shouldn't be used, as the calibration values vary per individual unit due to manufacturing tolerances, even for the same model. On the other hand, the Dell has much better reflection handling and faster response time, resulting in clearer motion. If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their Dell Alienware AW2521Hdoesn't correspond to our review, let us know and we'll update the review. The ASUS'slightly higher refresh rate and better response times provide a marginally better gaming experience, but its smaller screen size and lower resolution make it lessideal for work and media consumption. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is somewhat better than the Gigabyte AORUSAD27QD. TheASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A is much better than the AOC CQ27G2. Oddly, the refresh rate is capped at 240Hz. Lastly, it can only deliver an okay HDR experience because it has a low contrast ratio, no local dimming, and doesn't get bright enough to make highlights pop the way they should. Jun 16, 2022: Restructured article due to reflect user needs; replaced the ASUS VG279QM and the ASUS VG259QM with the ViewSonic XG2431 because it's better; LG 27GN750-B because it's easier to find and it's better, and renamed to 'Higher Refresh Rate Alternative'; added the ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM to Notable Mentions. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is a much better monitor than the ASUS TUF VG27VQ. There's also a difference in supported variable refresh rates, as the PG279QM natively supports G-SYNC, resulting in a more visually consistent gaming experience if you have an NVIDIA graphics card. Increasing the MBR setting decreases the amount of time each frame is visible on the screen, causing the apparent brightness to decrease, but improving the appearance of motion. However, the VG27WQ1B has a VA panel with much better contrast, it has a quicker response time at 60Hz, and it displays a wide color gamut for HDR content. Its wide viewing angles and outstanding ergonomics make it easier to share work or content, and its great peak brightness makes it suitable for brightly-lit settings. They are very similarly built and look almost identical, but the IPS panel of the VG259QM has wider viewing angles and a slightly better contrast ratio. It can't display dark colors well due to its low contrast ratio, but there are no real issues otherwise. That said, it maintains the brightness very consistently across different content. The ASUS TUF VG259QM doesn't have a local dimming feature. They're both 1440p monitors with a native 144Hz refresh rate, but the ASUS can be overclocked to 165Hz. The ASUS also supports HDR, and it has an optional Black Frame Insertion feature. White balance and gamma are nearly perfect. However, the ASUS has a slightly quicker response time at its max refresh rate than the Acer, but it's slower at 60Hz. The Dell Alienware AW2521H doesn't have a local dimming feature. The ASUS has significantly better ergonomics, a bit better reflection handling, a wider BFI flicker range, and it has built-in speakers. The best overdrive setting is 'Off' because the other options have more overshoot with minimal improvement to the total response time. However, blacks still appear closer to gray when viewed in the dark. ASUS originally announced this model with a 155Hz overclock, but it was released with 155Hz, 160Hz, and 165Hz options. It has a fast response time, low input lag, and a 165Hz refresh rate, resulting in smooth and responsive gameplay. It isn't recommended for content creation because it doesn't have full sRGB coverage, and it has trouble displaying yellows accurately, even after calibration. It supports FreeSync and is compatible with G-SYNC to reduce screen tearing. Fast-moving content has only minimal blur trail and the excellent refresh rate ensures smooth motion. However, the VG279Q has better viewing angles, out-of-the-box color accuracy, and gradient handling. The TUF VG27AQ has better ergonomics,HDR support, and better black uniformity, but the ROG Swift has native support for G-SYNC, a slightly faster response time, and better reflection handling. Overall, the ASUS TUF VG27AQ is marginally better than the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is an excellent IPS monitor that delivers a smooth and responsive gaming experience. It has a relatively small screen, which means you don't get much space to work with, and its resolution is limited to 1080p. Asus TUF VG259QM - 25" and 280hz so it's perfect for competitive gaming. That said, this is only noticeable when viewing dark scenes in a dark environment. The input lag is remarkably low and the high resolution and screen real estate allow you to see more details of your gaming arena. The viewing angles are good enough for sharing content with others as long as image accuracy isn't a priority. The LG 27GN650-B has a large screen size that feels immersive, but its pixel density is relatively low due to its 1080p resolution. Having trouble deciding between two monitors? The ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A andthe ASUS TUF VG27AQ perform very similarly. It allows for all manner of adjustments so that you can place the screen easily at your optimal viewing position. Other than that, these two monitors are remarkably similar. There's cable management through the stand, but there's no quick release on it. It gets brighter and has wider viewing angles. Outstanding SDR Color Volume. On the other hand, the VG279AQL1A has significantly better ergonomics, whereas the VG249Q1A only allows for tilt adjustment. However, the Dell has a higher 360Hz refresh rate, better response time, and slightly lower input lag. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is better than the Razer Raptor 27 144Hz. It's slightly higher with BFI enabled, but it shouldn't be noticeable to most people. The response time at 60Hz is outstanding, and once again, you shouldn't notice any motion artifacts with fast-moving content. The Acer is a bit better for gaming, as it has a faster refresh rate and a slightly faster response time. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is an excellent IPS monitor that delivers a smooth and responsive gaming experience. Unfortunately, it's best enjoyed from directly in front due to the disappointing viewing angles, so it's not a great choice if you often share your screen with a colleague or client. ASUS originally announced this model with a 155Hz overclock, but it was released with 155Hz, 160Hz, and 165Hz options. The standard ELMB setting (without VRR) works between 120Hz and 280Hz, while the ELMB Sync setting (with VRR) can be enabled between 50Hz and 280Hz, but it doesn't actually do anything between 50Hz and 85Hz. If you want a 1440p monitor with a quicker response time, then look into the MSI Optix G273QF. It's an IPS monitor with a 24 inch screen and 1080p resolution. The AOC CQ27G2 is a decent monitor for office use. The VG259QM has a much higher refresh rate, faster response time, and HDR support. We tested theDell Alienware AW2521H, and there are no other variants. The backlight is entirely flicker-free, which helps minimize image duplication and reduce eye strain. It has trouble displaying both bright and dark colors at different luminance levels. On the other hand, the MSI is a bit bigger and has a VA panel, resulting in a much higher contrast ratio. The ASUS' black uniformity is much better, but the ViewSonic has a slightly faster response time. This eliminates image duplication and helps reduce eye strain. It's more important if you have a multi-monitor setup where it's mounted above eye level. Like most monitors, there are many overdrive settings available to customize your gaming experience. It displays bright colors well but struggles with dark colors due to its low contrast ratio. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx has a simple design that's almost identical to the Acer Nitro XF252Q. The Dell Alienware AW2523HF and the Dell Alienware AW2521H are both great 360Hz gaming monitors with a few differences. The Acer also supports a wide color gamut, which the ASUS doesn't, and it gets brighter in HDR. The AOC CQ27G2 is much better than the Samsung C27RG5. However, it has a fairly high 60Hz input lag, making it less ideal for console gaming. The vertical viewing angle is okay. put them under the same test bench, The back is plain except for the UltraGear branding and red accent ring. In terms of performance, they are very similar. It's very similar to the Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx in terms of gaming performance, but it has worse ergonomics, and it doesn't get as bright to combat glare. Also, it's hard to place the screen in a comfortable viewing position because the stand only allows for tilt adjustment. It has significantly better ergonomics and wider viewing angles, making it a better choice for co-op gaming. The LG 27GN880-B and the ASUS TUF VG27AQ are both 27 inch, 1440p monitors with an IPS panel. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx has an excellent SDR color gamut. Excellent SDR color gamut, with essentially perfect coverage of the sRGB color space used by most content. The Acer Nitro XF243Y is better than the ViewSonic XG2402 for most uses. Unfortunately, this means you'll likely have to go into the monitor's menus and change your overdrive setting each time you switch to 60Hz, as there's no single mode that performs well at any refresh rate. The PA278QV has wider viewing angles, better color accuracy, and it gets brighter. Amazon.com. 2020 is only mediocre. We purchase our own monitors and The ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A is decent for office use. Like all native G-SYNC monitors, it can't display a downscaled 1440p or 4k signal, so you're limited to 1080p. You can download our ICC profile calibration here. Gamma is close to the sRGB target curve, but dark scenes are a bit too dark and bright scenes are slightly brighter than they should be. You can find the controls on the screen's right backside. The Acer has a slightly faster refresh rate and slightly better response time, so fast-moving objects are a bit clearer. It's recommended to turn on ClearType (top photo), as it significantly improves the appearance of diagonal lines, as seen on the R and N. The VG27AQ's gradient handling is excellent. The TN panel, however, doesn't offer a significant advantage, as the VG259QM is a bit better in most ways that matter. The Acer has a lower input lag and a slightly higher refresh rate of 165Hzto providesmoother and more responsive gameplay. The ASUS has better vertical viewing angles, and the unit we tested has better black uniformity, but this varies. The LG 27GN650-B is good for media consumption. If you want a budget-friendly monitor with a VA panel and higher contrast, then check out the Samsung Odyssey G3 S24AG30. The Acer has much better ergonomics than the HP, making it easierto place the screen in an ideal viewing position. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx has good reflection handling. Unfortunately, this monitor can't take full advantage of the Xbox Series S|X. There are no noticeable issues in shades of gray, and most colors are displayed accurately. It also has a much quicker response time, making motion look smoother. There's no cable management. The Dell Alienware AW2521H has an incredible refresh rate. It supports FreeSync natively and is compatible with G-SYNC to reduce screen tearing. For the most part, the ASUS performs a lot better because it has significantly faster response times. The VG279QM has a faster response time, resulting in clearer motion with less blur, especially at 60Hz. Like most VA monitors, the AOC CQ27G2 27" has a great contrast ratio, resulting in deep blacks in dark scenes. The Dell is an office monitor with a much bigger screen, a higher resolution,and it gets a lot brighter. The input lag is exceptionally low. It gets bright enough to combat glare in well-lit rooms, and it has good reflection handling. The smaller screen size makes it easier to see the entire screen for better environmental awareness in some games; however, it feels less immersive. The back has a simple design similar to other AOC monitors we've tested. The ASUS has significantly better ergonomics, a bit better reflection handling, a wider BFI flicker range, and it has built-in speakers. Note that our tests don't account for the curvature of the screen. The AOC CQ27G2 is a decent 27 inch, 1440p monitor with a VA panel. It has a stand with amuch wider swivel range, and it supports HDR. The ASUS is better for gaming because it has a much higher refresh rate of 280Hz compared to the LG's 144Hz, and it also has better response times. Note:Some websites advertise the VG27AQ with a 155Hz overclock instead of 165Hz. The VG249Q1A has a 24" screen with a 1080p resolution, while the VG279AQL1A has a 27" screen with a 1440p resolution. The ASUSTUF VG27AQ is slightly better than the Acer Nitro XV273Xbmiiprzx in mixed usage. It's not very effective at limiting colors to the sRGB color space, but the other picture modes are more over-saturated. The Acer Nitro XF243Y and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM are both 1080p IPS gaming monitors, but the ASUS has a much higher refresh rate, 280Hz compared to the Acer's 165Hz. We tested the 23.8" ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A monitor, but there's also a 27" version called the VG279Q1A, which we expect to perform very similarly. It shares many similarities with its bigger brother, the ASUS VG279QM, as it also has a 1080p resolution and a 280Hz refresh rate.It has great visibility in bright environments thanks to its great peak brightness, but on the contrary, it isn't as well Only a few of the remaining inaccuracies can be spotted by the trained eye without the aid of a colorimeter. It's entirely plastic except for the stand's column, which is metal. The LG 27GN650-B doesn't have a local dimming feature. It's almost identical to the SDR peak brightness, so HDR content doesn't look much different from SDR. The VG259QM also supports HDR, and the unit we tested has much better black uniformity than the VG246H. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is much better than the BenQ ZOWIE XL2546K. The ASUS has a higher refresh rate to provide a smoother gaming experience, a Black Frame Insertion feature, and supports HDR. The response time at 60Hz is excellent. The video above is provided for reference only. It also has an exceptionallylow input lag and native G-SYNC variable refresh rate (VRR) support, but it doesn't support FreeSync. The Acer supports G-SYNC nativelyand doesn't supportFreeSync, whereas the ASUS has native FreeSync support and G-SYNC compatibility. The color temperature is no longer cool and is nearly perfect. It also has wider viewing angles, making it a better choice for playing co-op or sharing content. We measured the SDR peak brightness after calibration with Game Visual set to 'Racing Mode', and Brightness set to max. The MSI has better connectivity, though, with a built-in USB hub and support for NVIDIA's Reflex Latency Analyzer. Note that the BFI score is based on the minimum and maximum frequency at which it operates, not the BFI's performance. The Acer also has better reflection handling and better ergonomics. The ViewSonic is also better for console gaming because it downscales a 4k image, which the ASUS can't do. They're both 27 inch IPS monitors with a 1440p resolution. It has thin bezels on three sides and a slightly thicker bottom bezel. Additionally, the ASUS has a better contrast ratio and its refresh rate can be factory overclocked to 165Hz. Gamma follows the target curve well, but some scenes may be too dark. The response time at 60Hz is great. The V-shaped stand is relatively wide, but the feet are very thin, leaving more usable desk space. The ASUS has better ergonomics, but its build quality isn't as good as the FI27Q. The ASUS VG259QM looks almost identical to its bigger brother, the ASUS VG279QM, just in a smaller, more compact size. However, the MSI has a much better contrast ratio due to its VA panel, and it has slightly lower input lag and better reflection handling. The ASUSdelivers a better gaming experience because it has a slightly higher refresh rate of 165Hz and much faster response times. The Dell Alienware AW2521H works well with recent MacBooks. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is slightly better for gaming than theDell Alienware AW2521H. However, most gamers won't notice the difference between 360Hz and 240Hz panels, which you can get for less, such as theDell Alienware AW2521HF, or the 280Hz ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM. While its refresh rate can't be overclocked like the ASUS, the LG hasfaster response times with less overshootat both 60Hz and at max. The Dell S3221QS is better than the AOC CQ27G2 overall; however, they aren't intended for the same use. Unfortunately, there are some issues when using this monitor with a recent MacBook. The ASUS has much better ergonomics, so it's easier to place it in an ideal viewing position.
Skyrim At The Summit Of Apocrypha Book Puzzle, What Does A Special Education Teacher Do, Is The National Education Association Credible, Most Powerful Women 2022, Does Cancer Insurance Cover Skin Cancer, Daniel Schmachtenberger Iq, Biomedical Model Of Health Psychology,
